Thread:Jckeymaker/@comment-6692077-20131117004049/@comment-6692077-20140315040048

Hey Jckeymaker,

I noticed that you removed some of the edits that I made to that page ... any of the stats for cards where the max stats are not yet known. I understand wanting the data to be acurate, and I definitely don't want to confuse users by making them think, but I think that having approximate data for those cards makes the page much more useful.

Let's look at this from the user's perspective for a sec ... I as a player want to figure out what cards I should be trying to aquire and evolve, so I want to be able to look up things like:

- "What are the highest parameter cards in the game?"

- top 10 melee/magic/charm attack/defense cards

- best cards with a specific skill

Figuring out those types of things on the current site is difficult, requiring the player to go to several different pages.

The All Cards page could solve that problem, but if we aren't willing to put approximate stats on this page, then in my opinion, it largely makes this page useless for answering such questions because I won't see any of the latest cards which are, of course, also usually among the best in the game, and are also the cards that users will most want to find out about..

To avoid confusing users by showing incomplete stats, I was trying to use a consistent format to indicate when the stats did not truely represent the max stats. That's why I had the plus symbols on those stats:

+ = 6-11 stats

++ = 4-7 stats

+++ = 4-1 stats

If we're going to do this, we should obviously add this information to the legend at the top of the page. Anyway .. please consider adding these stats back on the page as I think it would be much better for everyone who is trying to plan how to build their decks. Thanks