Talk:Genji/@comment-140.254.124.59-20130223065203/@comment-192.203.187.82-20130311175231

Maybe I'm not thinking straight but your example only applies when the percentages are that high don't they? If say 100 stam = 1.5% and 30 stam = 0.5% the 30 stam is slightly better no?

I don't think it's a question of them lying really...because what they say is correct - per attempt the 100 stam has a higher chance. The question is which is overall more efficient.

And in terms of intent - I'm sure their intent is for 100 stam to be the best. I just question their coding which has proven over and over to suck.