Talk:The Heart's Dark Reflection/@comment-5.14.31.40-20130928092333/@comment-134.134.137.75-20130930185735

9 UR for 80 pp... I simply don't believe that is possible UNLESS you participated in the "unexpected" raids and got the bulk of them in that way. I have many of the same cards you have, James. The exception being I used a MAX base Death Knight - which I realize doesn't hit as hard as an EVO. But I have 6-11 Archbishop and Beowulf plus Ouroboros EVO, all of which are used for raid only / not in my active deck normally. For me, 50 pp in the fourth raid put me in 519th place, netting me 2 MR (for zero pp I could have gotten 1 MR). Now, one pitfall I'm calling you on is the fact that you are applying your experience to what everyone else "should have" experienced. That is farcical... and I realize that I'm doing the same thing in noting my 50 pp / 519th place above. However, I find it very hard to believe that your deck and mine are so different that you can spend 80 pp and get 9 UR, and I can spend 180 (with 50 in one raid, as mentioned) and get 0 UR. For reference, my total ATK WITH the raid adv cards was 186K (without boosts). Basically, something isn't adding up. Also, rank Z resulted in one MR, not two. Still good that you could get one MR with one hit, but I need to correct you in this regard as you have repeatedly said two MR for rank Z. I want to be VERY CLEAR here... None of the above is intended to apply generally to this event. The myriad problems are facts, and I won't restate those. I am merely trying to set the record straight, as I believe you are (1) skewing your experience, perhaps to emphasize your point, and (2) applying your (alleged) individual experience to the community as a whole. (1) is dishonest. (2) is just self-centered. Both anger me.